Image
Vishal Sahody: Thinking man
Agile or Not Agile? That Is NOT the Question!

Rethinking the Agile Debate in a Changing Professional Landscape

More than fifteen years ago, two brothers—frustrated by the inefficiencies of traditional software development—conceived the Agile framework. They envisioned a more responsive, human-centred approach to engineering solutions. Their blueprint was less a rigid methodology and more a philosophy: one of collaboration, adaptability, and continuous improvement. Originally grounded in software engineering, Agile swiftly outgrew its digital roots.

Today, Agile is deployed far beyond code and commits: in marketing teams, HR departments, legal firms—even woodworking, where precision and iteration go hand-in-hand.

The question we should be asking isn’t “Agile or not?”—it’s “Are we working in a way that fosters impact, accountability, and growth?”

Agile has suffered somewhat from its own popularity. Its core principles—flexibility, openness to change, respect for people—have been diluted in certain contexts, reduced to jargon or worse, rigid dogma. Ironically, many “Agile” implementations betray the very fluidity they aim to promote.

Some common misapplications:

  • Sprinting with no clear direction or retrospection
  • Daily stand-ups as performative rituals
  • “Velocity” mistaken for productivity

Agile becomes performative when teams pursue form over function. What’s needed is purposeful adaptation, not blind allegiance

Image
Vishal Sahody: Digital Portfolio
The question we should be asking isn’t “Agile or not?”—it’s “Are we working in a way that fosters impact, accountability, and growth?”

Five Years in Agile Practice

Having led and contributed to Agile initiatives across disciplines over the past five years, I’ve observed a few key truths:

People First, Process Second

Successful Agile is always people-centric. It’s not about tools or rituals—it’s about trust, communication, and the freedom to adjust course when needed.

In one project, we introduced Agile into a client-facing communication team. Stand-ups were informal check-ins, sprint reviews became collaborative showcases, and retrospectives doubled as a space for emotional intelligence. The result? Greater clarity, fewer blockers, and stronger stakeholder relationships.

Adaptability Over Rigidity

Agile shouldn’t feel like a straitjacket. Too often, teams feel guilty for “not being Agile enough,” when in reality, they’re adapting the framework wisely to suit their context.

For example, in mentoring scenarios, we applied Agile principles not through boards and burn-down charts, but via flexible milestones, open feedback loops, and co-created learning journeys.

Purposeful Rituals Create Rhythm

The magic isn’t in the daily stand-up—it’s in what the stand-up unlocks. Short syncs, well facilitated, become gateways to deeper problem-solving and alignment. Without meaning, they’re just calendar clutter.

One key shift was redefining our “definition of done”—not just as task completion, but as shared understanding and readiness for the next step. That small tweak reduced rework and sparked ownership.

Language Matters: Agile and Communication

Agile thrives on clarity and psychological safety. In high-performing Agile teams, communication is:

  • Brief but empathetic
  • Regular but not intrusive
  • Assertive yet inclusive

One adjustment I recommend: replacing phrases like “You didn’t do this” with “What might help us move this forward?”—a subtle shift that invites solution-building.

This principle, borrowed from Agile retrospectives, is especially powerful in mentoring, team conflict resolution, and client feedback sessions.

 

Agile and Emotional Intelligence

Agile frameworks naturally dovetail with emotional intelligence—especially in environments that value growth and mentorship.

Key lessons:

  • Retrospectives nurture reflection and resilience
  • Flexibility fosters inclusion—especially for neurodiverse team members
  • Peer review builds trust when framed as shared improvement

In one memorable retrospective, a junior team member shared discomfort with the pacing of tasks. The openness of the space allowed them to voice concerns, and the team collectively restructured responsibilities—no hierarchy, just humanity.

 

So… Agile or Not Agile?

It really doesn’t matter.

What matters is whether your framework—Agile, hybrid, or something entirely bespoke—enables:

  • Mutual understanding
  • Purposeful rhythm
  • Adaptability to change
  • Emotional and professional growth

Agile is not the destination—it’s a versatile vehicle. The key is choosing a mode of working that aligns with your team’s values, goals, and context.

 

Key Takeaways for Practitioners

  1. Focus on Purpose, Not Process
    Constantly realign practices with your team’s goals and energy levels.
  2. Redefine Success
    Move beyond deliverables. Think in terms of clarity, collaboration, and sustainability.
  3. Nurture Psychological Safety
    Retrospectives and reviews are goldmines for wellbeing—use them wisely.
  4. Refine Your Language
    Structure feedback and discussions to invite ownership and empathy.
  5. Start Where You Are
    Don’t chase purity. Adapt Agile to your team’s reality and culture.

 

Final Thoughts

Agile is not a silver bullet, nor is it a static set of rules. It’s a living mindset. And when wielded with intent, empathy, and adaptability, it becomes a powerful force for good—not just in software, but across every human-centred discipline.

So ask not “Are we Agile?”—ask instead “Are we evolving purposefully?”

And that, truly, is the only question that matters.